Archive for the ‘media’ Category

History is hard

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

As anyone who cares already knows, today is the day Billboard changes the rules for its album charts and allows releases older than 18 months to appear on the Top 200. Considering the season, it’s no surprise that a large number of those older LPs are Christmas records. There seem to be some problems with the historical numbers, though. Michael Jackson’s Thriller is correctly shown with a peak position of 1. Oddly enough, though, The Beatle’s remasters, all of which also went to number one in their original release, show totally different peak postions. The White Album, for instance, shows a peak position of 152, it’s current position on the chart, despite being number 1 for nine weeks in 1968. The listing for Abbey Road is even more confusing. It was number 1 for 11 weeks, but Billboard shows its peak as 69, a number that makes no sense since its current position is 118 and it wasn’t on the chart last week. The remaster also made top ten on the old Comprehensive chart, so they can’t be referring to that, either. Perhaps not coincidentally, however, 69 does match up with the year of Abbey Road’s original release. It’s enough to make you wonder if they’re still doing these things by hand.

Update (11/30/09): The numbers are correct in the print edition, but are still wrong in both online versions of the chart. Guess nobody proofs the web sites.

Now wait a minute…

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Anya Marina’s cover of T.I.’s “Whatever You Like”, which I reviewed in my last New this week post, is bad enough, but in Billboard—or at least the Hot 100 chart (both in print and on the Billboard.biz site, but only available by subscription)—she’s also credited with writing it. This will no doubt come as a surprise to the four guys who are credited on the original version, including T.I. himself. Did she think he wouldn’t notice while he was in jail? Or did he give the rights to her as part of his community service? If the latter, he should do a little extra time for contempt of court.

If ZOMBIEBOT says it’s OK…

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Now that it’s been a couple of weeks I would like to go on record just one more time and say that the Maura-less Idolator, now that the new writers are settling in, is even worse than it was at first. It’s bad enough, as many people point out, that all they now cover is pop, but the mindless attempts at humor and above-it-all cynicism are enough to make anyone gag (or want to apply one).

The comments section, however, has become a real hoot.

No news is no news department

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

Bruce Springsteen, veteran of 40 years of touring, calls Michigan Ohio. Somehow this is worthy of the top spot at Yahoo News. Another hero bites the dust.

CDs down, digital and vinyl up

Friday, November 13th, 2009

This report on digital and vinyl sales, despite it’s own slightly wondering tone, doesn’t surprise me in the least. The key, which the article mentions but doesn’t make much of, is the growing trend of including download codes with vinyl releases, giving consumers the best of both worlds: a solid, permanent, fetishistic object (CDs just never made it in that respect) which also provides great sound when you’re at home, plus the ease of portability—all without having to spend two hours burning the music from vinyl. It’s a win-win, and I can’t understand why more labels aren’t taking advantage of it. Personally, I would also like to see them include download codes for the music from live DVDs. If the music by itself wasn’t available anywhere else (at least legally), a lot of fans would eat them up. I’d have bought Leonard Cohen’s Live in London DVD if it had included one.

Sit down children, it’s time to meet your benevolent masters

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

The new staff writers of Idolator have finally taken the time to introduce themselves in what may be one of the most condescending, childish, self-superior, we-know-what’s-good-for-you-better-than-you- do posts I’ve ever read. There’s nothing I can add to what’s already been said in the comments section, and ILX has been having a field day with this, as well, but I do want to say that, as one of the few sites that looked at all forms of pop music with intelligence, maturity, humor, and a world-wearied-but-never-nihilistic cynicism, I will miss the old Idolator tremendously. So good luck to Maura, Chris, Christopher, Dan, Lucas, Jess, and everyone else who has ever sailed with them. And if I had a million dollars…

P.S. If whoever is editing the Best Music Writing comp for DaCapo this year doesn’t include Jess Harvell’s piece on The Misfits, I’m going to be really pissed.

Worth watching

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

This may not make any immediate difference, but Nielsen Business Media is reportedly selling Billboard, and a host of other entertainment trade magazines, to News Communications Inc., which also owns Who’s Who and the insiderish political magazine The Hill. I wouldn’t expect any immediate changes, but I would love to see the equivalent of The Hill’s all-encompassing reporting applied to the music industry.

Michael Jackson continues to fiddle with the music business

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Billboard has announced changes in some of their album charts for the coming year. Aside from a rearrangement of how the R&B album chart is counted and the addition of a Folk Music chart (how that will be defined seems open to question), the biggest change is in the Top 200 Albums chart, which will now be based solely on sales, regardless of release date. Since 1991, Billboard has taken albums that were over two years old (later amended to 18 months) off the chart. In the last year, however, especially after the death of Michael Jackson (now the biggest selling artist of the year) and the release of the Beatles Remasters, that formula has been called into question (the change only affects the Top 200; all the other album charts will still drop LPs over 18 months old).

It’s not a surprise decision. People have been murmuring about the chart not being an honest reflection of popularity for a while now, and since the record labels are probably making more money off of re-issues these days than new releases, it will provide a more accurate reflection of commercial realities, as well. We’ll be seeing a lot more MJ and Beatles (not to mention Bob Marley, Creedence, and The Eagles), which isn’t necessarily a good thing, but we’ll also be seeing a lot fewer albums that have barely scraped 20,000 sold in the top ten.

It may not be what the record labels want (they were the biggest supporters of the exclusionary rule, since it put more focus on new releases), but at least it will give everyone a better idea of what the public wants, and it also seems to play into Billboard’s own business development plan. I can’t help but wonder if Billboard’s decision isn’t partly driven by the fact that they now make the entire Top 200 available on their website, with links to purchase charted albums. Not only will it be less confusing to the layman audience that comes by their site, but it also ensures that only the most popular records are available for sale. I’m sure the editorial/commercial divide at Billboard is fairly strict, but the company has been slowly moving toward becoming not just an information provider, but a player in the music business itself (a move that’s even more direct outside the US, where Billboard stages awards shows and owns concert venues). I still trust their numbers, but more and more I’m beginning to doubt their motives.

Truisms their bread and butter

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Slate discovers another trend in pop music that’s been around for decades (if not centuries). My favorite comment title: “Why do you keep writing music articles?” They’ve got to fill those blog pages somehow.

Damn, I must have left it on the kitchen counter!

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

I know things are bad for The New York Times these days, what with declining circulation, online competition, editorial queasiness regarding hard to define words like “torture”, dishonest contributors, and feeble attempts to draw readers by running stories about the porn industry on the front page, but you’d think they’d know better than to open themselves to ridicule by printing paragraphs like this:

In the middle of the night, Diane Van Deren will leave her house against the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. She will cut west through the dark canyons with her running shoes and a headlamp, but without a kiwi-sized part of her right temporal lobe.

This is a questionable story for the front page anyway, but to open with a passage that, if it were the start of a novel, would be a candidate for the Bullwer-Lytton Fiction Contest, makes you wonder if the editors at the Times are leaving parts of their brains at home as well.