Archive for the ‘pop culture’ Category

What price Hollywood?

Tuesday, March 8th, 2011

I’ve never been terribly impressed by David Hajdu’s writing. His book Positively Fourth Street, about Dylan, Baez, Richard Farina, and Greenwich Village in the early sixties wasn’t bad, and had some great anecdotes, but his last book, The Ten-Cent Plague, about the comic book scare of the early ’50s, managed to take a fascinating story full of brilliant eccentrics and make it as dull as a high school social studies text. Now Hajdu has a regular column in The New Republic on music, a subject about which he seems to possess a great deal of information but next to zero knowledge.

His latest column, on Randy Newman’s Oscar win for “We Belong Together” from Toy Story 3, may be his worst yet. To suggest that a man who has been scoring motion pictures for over thirty years, who in doing so continues a family tradition (three of Newman’s uncles worked as composers in Hollywood), is somehow trapped and forced into a business that belittles his artistry is so insulting as to be beyond belief. Newman himself would no doubt shrug a comment like this off; he’s heard it all before, and worse. Of course he’s written bad scores, and scored bad movies (one of which, Leatherheads, I saw just the other night—Newman even makes an appearance as a speakeasy piano player), and he would be the first to admit that his Hollywood songwriting isn’t his best. But Newman, who is notorious for his long spells of writer’s block, has often pointed out that he loves the work, and that if it wasn’t for Hollywood he might not be writing music at all.

Hajdu is one those cultural leftovers who still believes that all pop art is based on trash (as opposed to merely containing trash, which can be said of work at any levels) and that any actual value it may possess is an accident, like a child babbling nonsense who suddenly says something beyond its years. Trying to prove his point, he fudges the lyrics to “We Belong Together”. Trying to prove how pedestrian they are, he quotes “Sincerely, from the bottom of my heart/I just can’t take it/When we’re apart … The day I met you/Was the luckiest day of my life/And I bet you feel the same…”

Banal enough, to be sure, but Hajdu makes it seem even worse by leaving off the final throwaway line, uttered by Newman with a perfect tone of ironic self-doubt: “At least, I hope you do”. It’s a trick Newman has pulled many times before, but it works, and no one but Newman would dare to put a line like that in a feel-good buddy song (and just about no company but Pixar would allow him to do it). At times it seems as if Newman is the last in a tradition of sophisticated, witty Hollywood songwriters (if only Newman was as prolific). A group who often, as Hajdu points out, wrote trash themselves. Hajdu seems to think he’s doing Newman a favor, but all he does is condescend.

Tchotchkes for everybody!

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

The most hilarious thing about all the reactions to Steve Stoute’s full page ad lambasting the Grammy Awards, is the sense you get that everyone enters the discussion as if there were no other awards for music besides the Grammys. The even gets to the point where Stoute and others suggest founding yet another awards show, on which, presumably, the artists they want to be recognized will be recognized, and even allowed to perform.

My question is, where are they going to fit another award show in the schedule? Between the American Music Awards and the Billboard Music Awards? Maybe between the Academy of Country music Awards and the BET Awards, or even the BET Hip-Hop Awards. Or maybe they could squeeze it in between the Dove Awards and the Teen Choice awards. There might still be room, as well, between the MTV Video Music Awards and the People’s Choice Awards, or between the Country Music Television Awards and the Urban Music Awards. Of course, if they want an international audience, they’ll need to be careful about conflicts with the Brit Awards, or the Mercury Prize, or the Juno Awards, or Billboard and MTV’s various international awards. And let’s not forget the American Idol, X Factor, So You Think You Can Dance, and Eurovision Song Contest finales. It’s a full plate of awards, you see. Let’s make sure everybody gets a commemorative one.

Update: And don’t forget MTV’s OMAs, their new digital music awards show.

Where have I seen this before?

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Slow as I am, I’ve only now gotten around to watching the Grammy awards (I was at a film noir festival the night they were broadcast, watching Ronald Coleman go insane and murder Shelley Winters while reciting Shakespeare—it was worth it). I have nothing much to add to the discussion except for one thing: did anyone else notice that Eminem and Dr. Dre pulled exactly the same sentimental schtick that Justin Bieber and Usher did earlier in the show? You know, up and coming white kid paying homage to the older black mentor who helped him break into a largely segregated genre? I just wish there had been a video of Eminem meeting Dre like the one they had of Bieber and Usher. Though I suppose that wouldn’t be suitable for network TV, would it?

Sunday night indie fever

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

Now that the speculation as to why Arcade Fire managed to win the Album of the Year Grammy has died down a bit, and all the “indie is dead” jokes have been made, I would like to offer my own theory, which can be summed up in a very few words: U2 didn’t make a record last year. The academy, in it’s basic leanings, has not changed one bit. The Suburbs is the sort of album that has always appealed to them, at least over the last twenty or thirty years: a concept album packed with serious intent put together by an actual band that plays, for the most part, traditional acoustic and electric instruments instead of turntables and sequencers, has a solid footing in the good-old ideas of rock and roll, even if they often deny it, and puts on a great, let’s-make-the-audience-feel-like-they’re-really-a-part-of-the-action live show. Awarding Album of the Year to Arcade Fire was the conservative move, not a daring step into indie land. The fact that the band is on Merge instead of one of the major labels is meaningless. Merge, along with Matador and Sub-Pop, may technically not be a major label, but it’s a major player, in a position not unlike that of 60s labels such as Atlantic and Elektra. People in the industry pay attention to them, and give them far more respect than the indie community itself, if there is such a thing anymore, seems to realize.

At the same time, can we finally put aside the idea that the Grammy voters are all tasteless idiots who care about nothing but pristine studio craftmanship and commercial success? This canard was most obviously in evidence this year in the way so many people began predicting a Lady Antebellum sweep once “Need You Now” had picked up the Song and Record of the Year awards. “Need You Now” is a very good record, maybe even a great one (it certainly has at least one great moment), and it’s the sort of thing that’s catnip to Academy voters. But it’s also far superior to anything else on the album, and the members of the Academy knew it. Now that they can buy them separately, even they can remember the difference between a great single and a great album.

Just their imagination

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

Simon Reynolds:

all these sounds from Euro and club music and the more commercial end of techno, it’s almost like a second B-Boys on E moment, except i doubt E has anything to do with it… it’s not a trend driven by the streets, it’s coming from producers, from their lack of imagination and their desire/need for international sales… so it’s more like a second Hip House moment… rapping figures as part of the hit-maker’s arsenal in the same way as it did for C+C Music Factory

These seems off to me, even though in part I agree with it. There’s no doubt that the injection of recycled Euro-disco into hip-hop is a producer-driven phenomenon—street-driven hip-hop at the moment is more along the lines of crankin’, jerkin, and dougie-ing. But I don’t see what lack of imagination has to do with it. In fact, it may well be the opposite, the practice of individual imagination being, at the moment, more important than organic cultural influences, at least in a commercial sense. Whatever you may believe about hip-hop as music, as culture it’s already past its prime, and though it’s still the dominant commercial form (at least as far as radio is concerned), and it’s not as decrepit in a cultural sense as rock and roll, and may even throw up a few surprises in the years to come, it’s feeling its age. So producers are looking for anything that will juice it up and get it’s blood flowing again. Euro-disco, mimimalist and ambient techno, ’50s rock and doo-wop, even classical and operatic influences.

In some ways it reminds me of the state of swing music in the late ’40s and early ’50s, when A&R men searched through Italian, Cuban, and Brazilian styles, country, folk, blues, even the burgeoning R&B, doo-wop, and rock and roll movements, for anything that would inject some life into a genre that had obviously run out of steam. A lot of terrible music came out of that period, but also a lot of amazing, hybrid records that are as startling today, perhaps even more so, as they were at the time. So although I agree things are bad, I wouldn’t blame the producers. As for the streets, they’ll take over again in time. They always do.

How country are country fans?

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

If this post is any indication, very. I suppose the same thing could be done with hip-hop and rock and indie fans, but when country fans set their iTunes to shuffle, all they get is country (and the occasional pop hit).

Are country fans more mature than pop fans?

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

When it comes to lusting after celebrities, maybe so.

I love you because you’re such a joke

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

One of the odd things about pop music (music in general, really) is that it’s possible for someone to love the work of a particular musician even while getting it wrong. Take this obit of The White Stripes as an example: once you get past the hyperbole of the headline (“The White Stripes: Music’s Last Great Rock Band?”), you find an article by a writer who believes that their best songs were little more than nonsense and that their most serious and most pretentious moments were nothing but jokes. That’s why he loves them, because he thinks they made fun of the idea that anyone takes this stuff seriously. He comes that close to saying that they were great because they were awful. Anybody who really thinks about what this piece is saying, especially when you consider the headline, would be completely confused. No wonder so many people think critics are self-important, self-deluded idiots.

A word of advice

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

Dude, don’t be putting down yacht rock if you can’t tell the difference between the bland (Phil Collins, Hall & Oates, Feist, Grizzly Bear) and the quiet but intense (James Blake, Destroyer). Notice he doesn’t mention Steely Dan or Fleetwood Mac, who would blow his whole argument, such as it is, out of the water.

Glee: the final word

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

For months now I’ve been trying to come up with some final statement regarding Glee. I’ve made at least three attempts, but every time I think I’ve gotten close I stumble over the amount of historical knowledge I thought was required to really understand it and the theoretical framework I’ve built up in my head to explain its import. But this weekend I came up with an idea that for some reason had never occurred to me before: Glee has no import. Not just aesthetically (which should be obvious), but culturally, as well. It doesn’t move the culture forward, but it doesn’t move it backwards, either. I had thought of Glee, at first, as a musical graveyard which eventually became, as so many graveyards do in popular culture, a zombie playground, but it’s too unimportant, and too late in the game, for that. The old pop it seems to kill was dead, at least as a cultural force, long before Glee arrived, and though it appears to be devouring modern pop, it does so only to consume those parts of it that are reminiscent of the old, ignoring anything new and important. Glee is like an historical marker at a rest stop, where an exhausted culture can catch a quick nap and absorb some sketchily delivered history before it moves on to its next, only vaguely understood, destination. In any other sense, Glee is insignificant. And if Ryan Murphy can keep his mouth shut, or unless some miracle occurs, I don’t intend to ever mention it again.