Archive for the ‘The Biz’ Category

The future

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

Since the annual Midem Conference was last week, it’s now time for “Oh my God, what are we going to do next?” week. Mark Mulligan, of Forrester Research, scared everyone at Midem to death by declaring digital a failure. The reaction to his speech was so negative that he put an editorial in Billboard clarifying his position, and stating that digital is only currently a failure, but that things will get better as soon as somebody (anybody?) comes up with a new idea to capitalize on digital distribution. Needless to say, he offers no suggestions himself (to be fair, that’s not his job). Meanwhile, on another panel, BMG Rights CEO Hartwig Masuch declared that A&R was dead, since everybody could feed their music directly to the public without having to go through labels or a publisher. The other panelists vehemently disagreed with him, but then they would. Gatekeepers are more important than ever, they said, apparently failing to recognize that the role of gatekeeper has largely been taken over by the audience’s peers (that is, other members of the audience), who most likely have no real idea what they’re talking about. At the same time, word continues of MySpace’s imminent collapse, which causes Hypebot to chortle in glee. Meanwhile, Billboard, which stays ahead of the music industry by being only slightly behind everyone else, has started an “Uncharted” chart, which tracks the popularity of “undiscovered” bands on, you guessed it, MySpace, along with YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking and music sites. On top of all of this, everyone’s still waiting for Apple, Google, Spotify and whoever else feels like it, to open their streaming service in the US (not to mention the upcoming, much needed, Rhapsody redesign). Meanwhile, label execs are playing musical chairs, not just with themselves (UMG Chairman Doug Morris has been invited to take over Sony), but with their companies, as Warner Music investigates the possibility of selling off their publishing division so they can buy EMI.

But with all that, there’s still a future for the music business, as demonstrated by this listing of the top 21 stars under 21.

Oh, dear God, we’re doomed.

How did the Decemberists debut at number one?

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

The old-fashioned way: they promo-ed the thing to death and practically gave it away. Works every time.

Political blackmail, Glee division

Wednesday, January 26th, 2011

Don’t like Glee? Don’t care about Glee? Don’t want your music to be used on Glee? Well, guess what? According to producer Ryan Murphy, that means you’re against arts education for seven-year olds. At least that’s what Murphy says about Kings of Leon, who rejected the show last year and refused to let the program use their music. Murphy calls them self-centered assholes, and boy would he know. Could someone please ask Murphy how much of the money he makes off of Glee merchandise, soundtracks, DVDs, tours, spin-off reality shows, etc., actually goes towards arts education projects? Cause it sure as hell isn’t going to the cast members who do all the singing.

Update: And now it’s getting worse. Kings of Leon aren’t the sharpest guys on the block, I admit, but Murphy is shameless.

Welcome to product placement hell

Wednesday, January 26th, 2011

Wouldn’t it have been more honest to just string together commercials with the song as a soundtrack? Yuck.

Uh-Oh

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011

Yeah, it’s the slow time of the year, but combined sales for all top ten albums on the upcoming Billboard chart, including three debuts, was less than 320,000. Nearly a decade of steady decline and this industry still hasn’t bottomed out; which only gives you a sense of how over-inflated it really was.

Hurry, wait. No, wait. No, hurry. No…

Monday, January 17th, 2011

In a Los Angeles Times piece about new ways to release music, Ann Powers reprints a quote from Wayne Coyne of The Flaming Lips that sums up in a sentence one of the things I like most about the new world created by digital singles: “We want to try to live through our music as we create it, instead of it being a collection of the last couple years of our lives.” Which is to say that instead of the grand statements that albums represent, he wants to carry on what might best be described as a conversation with his audience. That doesn’t mean grand statements aren’t worthwhile, just that for too long we lived in a world where that was all that was available, almost all that was allowed.

I think I’ve gone over this before, but once a month, or once every six weeks, strikes me as the ideal time span between singles. Once a week, as Kanye West recently proved—and that many others are about to learn—is too often. I got bored with G.O.O.D. Fridays after about a month, not because the music was poor (it wasn’t) but because the conversation was too one-sided. West did all the talking, and we were barely given time to absorb one statement before he was launching into another one. It was exciting at first, but then it got wearing. West may be better suited as an album artist: he thinks he has a lot to say (and sometimes he does), and he likes to say it all at once. I have no problem reflecting on his ego with almost as much attention as he gives it himself, provided I have a chance to breath once in a while.

The same is true, though, even for the most mindless pop singles. I want time to enjoy them, to squeeze all the fun out of them I can, to make the good ones a part of me. A week just isn’t enough time. That’s also why I dislike the current practice of previewing albums by releasing a single every week for the month leading up to the album’s release date. Either space them out over a longer time period as real singles, or give me the damn album. Back in the day, the labels wanted to delay the release of new music by a successful artist as long as possible, trying to squeeze every last bit of sales out of them and whet the audience’s appetite for the next one; now they think they can’t release them fast enough, because they’re afraid the audience will disappear in a heartbeat. Can’t these guys get anything right? You know the answer to that one.

Yeah, it’s nice of them, but…

Monday, January 10th, 2011

It’s wonderful news that Universal Music Group is donating over 200,000 master recordings to the Library of Congress, but it’s important to remember that all these recording are in the public domain, which means the chance of Universal making much money off of them in the future is limited, and that the label will no longer need to pay for their upkeep, preservation, and transfer to digital format. Not to mention the tax write-off. I’m more than willing to have my taxes spent in such a worthy cause, but that doesn’t mean I think any better of Universal than I did before. They’re cutting costs, is all, and making themselves look charitable in the bargain.

Update: Turns out that most of this stuff isn’t in the public domain after all (at least not the songs, though some of the performances may be), which will make streaming rights complicated. And a representative from UMG pretty much confirms that the label is using the Library of Congress to do digital restoration and mastering they can’t afford to do themselves, and will then turn around and release the cleaned up versions for profit. I suppose it’s still a good deal for both sides, but on the surface it looks a lot better for UMG than anyone else. Wonder how long it will take BMG and Sony to try and strike up the same deal.

It’s not all Vitaminwater

Monday, January 10th, 2011

Maybe this is what they mean by Twitter “influence”: 50 Cent recommends a stock, and the price goes up over 350%. Does the SEC know about this?

What a business

Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010

For those who have been wondering when Paramore’s Hayley Williams would launch a solo career, it looks like she did it a long time ago—she just didn’t tell anybody. Not sure how much of this story can be trusted (the biblical quotes don’t make me feel any better about its veracity), but it has the ring of truth to it.

Sucking at the internets

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

The difficulties of posting a new Diddy – Dirty Money video sends Eskay at Nah Right off on a rant:

It’s pretty obvious that these companies suck at the internet. And they hire people who suck at the internet and then they promote them. And then they teach their children and their children’s children to suck at the internet, and that’s why there are people out there who still use Internet Explorer and send me unsolicited music on Twitter.

Read the whole thing.

Update: And if there’s anybody who knows less about how music works on the internet than the record labels, it’s the government.