Posts Tagged ‘Frank Sinatra’

Into the woods, and out again

Friday, January 14th, 2011

This Guardian article by the usually flawless Tom Ewing is a perfect example of how looking at pop music almost solely as a rivalry between art and business can you lead you to the wrong conclusions. Trying to explain those moments when artists make records that seems beyond not just their own limitations, but everybody’s, and then retreat to safer ground the next time out, Ewing focuses on nothing but commercial pressures. He seems to ignore the personal and emotional forces that help to create such works, and often make it impossible to create another. The history of pop music is full of the stories of artists who created groundbreaking records of seemingly limitless musical and emotional depth, and then either retreated to safer pastures or collapsed completely: Sly Stone’s There’s A Riot Goin’ On; John Lennon’s Plastic Ono Band; Neutral Milk Hotel’s The Aeroplane Over the Sea; My Bloody Valentine’s Loveless; Van Morrison’s Astral Weeks; Bob Dylan’s string of mid-sixties triumphs (three different albums, but released in the space of a year); Nirvana’s In Utero; Frank Sinatra’s Only The Lonely; Pet Shop Boys’s Very; and, of course, The Beach Boys’s Smile, which stood uncompleted for almost forty years because Brian Wilson crashed and burned in the middle of making it.

Britney Spear’s Blackout and Rihanna’s Rated R share little in terms of quality with these records (though that opinion is subject to change), but they do share comparable stories of creation, coming as the result either of traumatic events, intense personal pressures, or sudden changes in viewpoint (i.e., Brian Wilson’s discovery of LSD). Each represents an artist going farther into themselves and their music than they ever had before and would ever be able to do again. Some moved on to safer, more comfortable ideas, some collapsed and weren’t heard from again for years, or ever. Some died. But I think it’s fair to say not one of them changed course because of commercial pressure. These records were anomalies, not just in terms of pop music as a whole, but in terms of the artist’s careers. They’re the Bob Beamon’s of pop music, and I would no more expect these artists to continue on in the same fashion than I would have expected Beamon to be able to jump over 29 feet every time he lifted both feet off the ground. There’s only so far into yourself you can go, and once you have, if you get out in one piece, you would have to be the rarest kind of human being to dare and go back again.

Weird tales of record pricing

Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

I’ve been noticing more and more anomalies in record pricing lately, especially in terms of downloads. A lot of people brought up the fact last week that with a little tweaking of special offers, you could buy Kanye West’s new album on Amazon for 99 cents, but I’ve found even odder differences that, if not quite on the level of that deal, will at least save you a few bucks. I’m mentioning these not as a consumer service, but just as an illustration of how confusing things are right now, for both consumers and sellers.

Example 1: Let’s say you want to buy the new Black Eyed Peas album (I know, I know, but let’s just say, all right?) There are something like six different versions available on Amazon (including one that features a “second disc” (sic) of all the singles from The E.N.D.—just in case you’ve been in a coma for the last two years and are trying to catch up quickly, I guess), but I’m only going to consider two of them: the regular edition, which has twelve songs, and the deluxe edition, which has fifteen. The regular edition is currently bargain priced at $4.99, the deluxe at $9.99. Individual songs are priced at $.99. Do I have to do the math for you? If you buy the regular edition, and then the three other songs that are included on the deluxe edition, you get the whole thing for $7.93, two dollars less than if you made your life easier and mathematics-free and just bought the deluxe edition.

Example 2: The BEP savings are minor, I admit, so how about this for a deal? On iTunes, and also on Amazon, you can buy Frank Sinatra’s The Best of The Columbia Years, a four-CD set, for $34.99 ($32.99 on Amazon). Not a bad deal, but consider this: you can also buy The Columbia Years (1943-1952): The Complete Recordings, a twelve-CD set, for only ten dollars more. I realize that there’s probably a lot of crap on that complete set, and the best of is the better listening experience, but isn’t that what playlists are for? Besides, it’s Sinatra. If completism is going to be this cheap, consider me a completist.

Random Notes #1

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Frank Sinatra
“If I Had You”
1962

In terms of the lyric, there’s no reason why this can’t be a happy song, and that’s the way Sinatra had recorded it in 1957 for his album A Swingin’ Affair. Five short years later, though, the situation has changed. He still hasn’t got the girl who could make his life pefection, who could turn him into a superman (Ava Gardner, perhaps?); now he’ll never have her, and he knows it. Instead of conquering the world, he’s incapable of doing anything at all, including sing—listen to the way his voice cracks at the end of the first middle eight on the line “if I had you by my side”. This is a different Sinatra than the one usually celebrated—a vulnerable, depressed, even broken Sinatra. It probably isn’t a coincidence that this was recorded the same year he made The Manchurian Candidate, the darkest and most unsettling of all his movies. A few years later he was back on top, singing “Strangers In the Night” and “That’s Life”, cool, defiant, triumphant once again. But the undercurrent of despair never left him, and two years before he died he put together the compilation Everything Happens To Me, which included this recording; it was the saddest Sinatra album since Only the Lonely. The sound on this video doesn’t do justice to the subtleties of Sinatra’s voice, but there’s no escaping the pain he’s trying to work his way through. It’s devastating.

New this week

Sunday, September 20th, 2009

Glee Cast—”Take A Bow”
#46

This is so bland I feel like I should apologize to Rihanna for saying her vocals lack personality. I can excuse actors for not being singers, but shouldn’t they at least know how to emote on the spoken bits? I’ve heard Glee is a pretty good show, but if it’s going to put records like this on the chart every week I may need to file a complaint with the FCC.

Jay-Z + Alicia Keys—”Empire State of Mind”
#50

The chorus is as hoakey as most “I Love My Hometown” songs, but it’s catchy, too, and it sticks in your head (somehow Jay-Z has convinced Keys to phrase just like he probably would if he could sing, which is both weird and fascinating somehow). The record as a whole, however, like everything else I’ve heard from The Blueprint III, is seriously off-kilter. This isn’t a song about how great New York is, it’s a song about how great Jay-Z was to rise from its mean streets to become a star. By name-checking Sinatra and paraphrasing Billy Joel for the title, he makes it obvious that he intends to supersede them as the King of New York; he then proceeds to paint a picture of the city that’s so dark, especially in the final verse, and takes such obvious enjoyment in putting down the suckers who aren’t as successful as he is, that you wonder why anybody would want to live there at all. Especially if they had to share the streets with this self-satisfied jerk.

Jay-Z + Mr. Hudson—”Young Forever”
#75

Immortality through fame isn’t a new idea, but Jay-Z raps like it is, and the first verse, where he parodies just about every rap video ever made, is great. The rest is just bragging, with unnecessarily dark overtones (he sounds like it’s only just occurred to him that he’s going to die someday—and who knows, maybe it did). As for Mr. Hudson, his voice is a garbled mixture of Sting and Chris Martin, and his phrasing is as cliched and obvious as that combination would suggest.

Three Days Grace—”Break”
#91

The lyrics say something about breaking through to a higher level, but the music breaks through nothing, not even the banality barrier, and I keep thinking that what they really mean is that everybody could use a nice vacation once in a while. If they promise to make theirs permanent I’d be happy to lend them some luggage.

Boys Like Girls featuring Taylor Swift—”Two Is Better Than One”
#92

A terrible song, and a darkly portentous one, since it suggests that Taylor Swift’s apparent weakness for guys in noisy pop-punk bands is badly affecting her judgment. Singing with Def Leppard on an awards show or dressing up like Kiss is harmless nostalgic fun, but aiding and abetting a band as awful as Boys Like Girls suggests a major lapse in judgment. She’ll regret this some day; if she doesn’t, we will.

Ester Dean featuring Chris Brown—”Drop It Low”
#94

I like the sound of this, which in it’s minimalism and dirty talk reminds me of some of the jerkin’ records coming out of L.A., and I like it even more near the end when the hooks pile up on each other in a mixture that isn’t minimalist at all. But Chris Brown’s presence is a conundrum. Was this recorded before he beat up Rihanna? Even if it was, why release it now? At this point, would any woman in her right mind climb into his Bugatti with him? Whatever the case, chances are this will go nowhere on radio, which is a shame. Couldn’t they get Drake or somebody for a remix?