Posts Tagged ‘Pet Shop Boys’

One of Those: Hot 100 Roundup—5/18/13

Friday, May 17th, 2013

Weeks like this not only make you doubt the importance and durability of pop music, they’re almost enough to sap your will to live. Pitbull is bad enough, but put Currington and Underwood on top and you’ll be crushed by the mediocrity of it all. Only Capital Cities manage to lighten the load, but not by much.

Billy Currington—“Hey Girl”
#75

Currington’s been around for a while, which means he has a jump on most of the other mediocre cowboys who populate country radio, and he sounds more confident, more professional and assured, as a result. But that doesn’t make him their king. He may have a little more meat on him, but he’s still just another part of the herd.

Carrie Underwood—“See You Again”
#90

“See You Again” is the fourth single from Carrie Underwood’s most recent album, Blown Away. It also happens to be the fourth track on the album. The first three singles were the album’s first three tracks, in order. “See You Again” is easily the worst of the four and represents a massive drop in quality compared to Underwood’s last single, “Two Black Cadillacs”. Really makes you want to hear the album, doesn’t it?

Arianna featuring Pitbull—“Sexy People (The Fiat Song)”
#97

This isn’t truly terrible—Pitbull’s Cuban-American pride gives it a level of meaning most of his records lack—but it’s still a Fiat commercial, and the music overall is a dumb joke that gets less funny every time you hear it. There is one good thing about it: it should pretty much kill any chance of Arianna becoming a star in the U.S.

Capital Cities—“Safe and Sound”
#99

I enjoy their steals, especially when they’re ripping off the Pet Shop Boys, but their L.A. distance and cool makes me doubt their humanity. Oddly enough, they remind me more of Devo than anyone else, only romantic and legato instead of dystopian and staccato. This is interesting, but “Safe and Sound” isn’t much of a song. Even more than the singing, the lyrics seem off—the apocalyptic romanticism isn’t felt, it’s just stuck on, like something they learned in a movie.

Uh-Oh

Monday, July 30th, 2012

There’s a song on the upcoming Pet Shop Boys album, Elysium, called “Your Early Stuff”. Following previous leaks “Invisible” (which I like), and “Winner” (which I don’t), this doesn’t sound promising. Will it be an album length version of “Samurai In Autumn” (boo) or an album length version of “Yesterday When I was Mad” (yay)? Keep your fingers crossed.

“Enjoy It While It Lasts”

Monday, July 2nd, 2012

The Pet Shop Boys’s Olympics anthem: uplifting and depressing at the same time, as usual. A lot better than Muse, though.

Being old is a bitch, especially for pop stars

Monday, June 11th, 2012

The new Pet Shop Boys single, “Invisible”, continues to explore their fascination with the pop process itself, this time from the point of view of a former star who continues to work but finds himself ignored by the younger generation. From anyone else, this song might be full of self-pity and woe, maybe anger; from PSB you get resignation, a touch of alienation, and acceptance tinged with remorse and self-doubt. You also get—at least this is my take on first listen—one of the best records they’ve made in years. The grandeur of decay has been one of their main themes for close to two decades; now they wear it like a second skin, and it suits them. The album, Elysium, comes out in September.

Anger can be power

Friday, January 28th, 2011

Alfred Soto at Humanizing the Vacuum performs a public service by reprinting part of an essay by Neil Tennant of Pet Shop Boys that appeared in Details in 1992, about the power and importance and positive aspects of hatred.

When people are told about Coke – “It’s the real thing” – they should think, “No, it’s a hideous soft drink that is fantastically unhealthy to drink, full of sugar that turns into glucose that turns into fat.” …And they should hate the people who represent that. They should hate Michael Jackson for trying to foist Pepsi onto them, to make them fat victims of their own society. They should hate more. Hate Pepsi, hate Coca-Cola, hate Michael Jackson. Hate George Bush. And think about the alternatives. That’s another good thing about hatred. It makes you think about the alternatives.

It reminds me of my favorite quote from Pauline Kael: “Has it ever occurred to you that caring for others brings a bite to the voice?” All those people who complain about snark should remember that it doesn’t always come from a jaded cynicism (though too often it does), but also from a deep and real hatred and anger on the part of people who actually care about what’s going on in the arts, in the culture, and in the world. Just remember that the next time I mention Glee.

Into the woods, and out again

Friday, January 14th, 2011

This Guardian article by the usually flawless Tom Ewing is a perfect example of how looking at pop music almost solely as a rivalry between art and business can you lead you to the wrong conclusions. Trying to explain those moments when artists make records that seems beyond not just their own limitations, but everybody’s, and then retreat to safer ground the next time out, Ewing focuses on nothing but commercial pressures. He seems to ignore the personal and emotional forces that help to create such works, and often make it impossible to create another. The history of pop music is full of the stories of artists who created groundbreaking records of seemingly limitless musical and emotional depth, and then either retreated to safer pastures or collapsed completely: Sly Stone’s There’s A Riot Goin’ On; John Lennon’s Plastic Ono Band; Neutral Milk Hotel’s The Aeroplane Over the Sea; My Bloody Valentine’s Loveless; Van Morrison’s Astral Weeks; Bob Dylan’s string of mid-sixties triumphs (three different albums, but released in the space of a year); Nirvana’s In Utero; Frank Sinatra’s Only The Lonely; Pet Shop Boys’s Very; and, of course, The Beach Boys’s Smile, which stood uncompleted for almost forty years because Brian Wilson crashed and burned in the middle of making it.

Britney Spear’s Blackout and Rihanna’s Rated R share little in terms of quality with these records (though that opinion is subject to change), but they do share comparable stories of creation, coming as the result either of traumatic events, intense personal pressures, or sudden changes in viewpoint (i.e., Brian Wilson’s discovery of LSD). Each represents an artist going farther into themselves and their music than they ever had before and would ever be able to do again. Some moved on to safer, more comfortable ideas, some collapsed and weren’t heard from again for years, or ever. Some died. But I think it’s fair to say not one of them changed course because of commercial pressure. These records were anomalies, not just in terms of pop music as a whole, but in terms of the artist’s careers. They’re the Bob Beamon’s of pop music, and I would no more expect these artists to continue on in the same fashion than I would have expected Beamon to be able to jump over 29 feet every time he lifted both feet off the ground. There’s only so far into yourself you can go, and once you have, if you get out in one piece, you would have to be the rarest kind of human being to dare and go back again.

New this week—4/11/10

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

Usher featuring will.i.am—”OMG”
#14

Despite the seal of approval provided by will.i.am, this is the lamest Black Eyed Peas rip you could imagine, and as far as I can tell it’s all Usher’s fault. The stylish minimalism that makes the Peas’s records compelling is filled in with meaningless noise, and the lyrics make Usher seem even dumber than BEP haters imagine the genuine article to be. At his worst he sounds like a lounge singer doing a Black Eyed Peas tribute; on the rest he’s a one-time star desperately trying to catch up to a scene that’s passed him by. In that way, at least, you can say Raymond v. Raymond is as true to life as Usher claims it is.

Diddy – Dirty Money featuring T.I.—”Hello Good Morning”
#34

This works, especially when T.I. is on the mike, and it’s a far better Black Eyed Peas rip than “OMG”, but like all Diddy tracks its show-offy and full of itself. When Diddy flaunts his ego with production tricks and flashy arranging rather than cynical fade-out raps or having his female vocalists moan his praises, he could almost be the pop genius he thinks he is. There’s a long way between “almost” and the real thing, though, and it’s a gap I doubt he’ll ever cross.

Lady GaGa—”Alejandro”
#72

I found it difficult to understand all the fuss last week over M.I.A. calling GaGa a “great mimic”. It’s obviously true, and I would say it’s even more obvious that GaGa knows it, often plays up to it, and enjoys doing it. That’s certainly the case on this rollicking slice of camp, in which she borrows heavily from Madonna, the Pet Shop Boys, and cheesy Italian telenovellas and mixes them all together into her own twisted joke. For some reason this makes me think of Tennesse Williams’s Suddenly Last Summer. “Alejandro”, thank God, doesn’t end in cannibalism, but I wouldn’t put it past her.

Travie McCoy featuring Bruno Mars—”Billionaire”
#92

One thing you can say about economic collapse: it’s good for party music, and equally good for comedy. Not a week goes by that somebody doesn’t put another joke track on the chart, creating what might well turn out to be the most interesting trend of what’s shaping up to be a very interesting year. This is the best of the bunch so far, partly because it addresses personal economics head-on, with just enough implied reality to make the jokes sting, and partly because, thanks to Bruno Mars, it’s the most musically accomplished and easiest to listen to for itself. I wonder when he’ll get a record of his own.

Erykah Badu—”Window Seat”
#95

This one takes a while to grow on you, but if you give it a chance and ignore the controversy over the video, it will. Subtle as it is, in both its music and its emotions, it steers perilously close at times to easy-listening. It never goes that far, but I can understand why some people find the new album too laid back and sentimental. I don’t think it’s either, but it may be a little too self-satisfied. Time will tell. (The video, considering the message of the song itself, makes no sense whatsoever—it’s an attempt to shove a political/sociological message into a place where it doesn’t belong.)

Clay Walker—”She Won’t Be Lonely Long”
#99

The surprising thing about this record is how restrained and sympathetic it is. I can think of any number of male country singers who would take the title line for a crude joke, squeezing as many knowing winks and vocal nudges out of it as possible. Walker, though, never evinces anything but respect, concern, and regret, without once suggesting that he’s interested in taking up with the woman himself, and he turns the usual wild-girl-in-the-honky-tonk cliches on their head. The music is too generic to make this a great record, but it’s a pleasant surprise nonetheless.