Posts Tagged ‘Pitchfork’

Away from the hype cycle

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

Sean Adams from Drowned In Sound offers some thoughts on how the flood of new music and the 24/7 music news cycle has lead the site to stop following what might best be referred to as the Pitchfork model. I’m especially impressed by the idea that that sort of coverage is an insult not just to readers but to the artists themselves: “You’d [be] for forgiven for thinking every last morsel of rock’n’roll’s cadaver had been gnawed, yet every day another Forkcast exclusive is mass-mailed out and interview time with bands who’ve done a session for a BBC 6Music evening show is offered up – I have no idea anymore what I’d ask some band who I’ve never seen live and only heard two songs by, just feels insulting – to them, especially.”

In my ample recently unemployed days I’ve been thinking a lot about what to with this blog, what direction to take it in, how much time I can devote to it when it brings me no money at all (those Google ads are there for a reason, folks; one click a day, that’s all I ask), and lot’s of other things that are of no real interest to anyone but myself. But this piece gives me a hint. DiS is right, I think, to take themselves out of the hype stream, but at the same time to take advantage of it. There’s tons of information out there, and though in some ways it is overwhelming, it’s also bound to put you in contact with music and ideas you never considered before and that will lift your spirits, elevate your mind, and maybe even make the world a better place (it has happened, you know). Fishing in the hype stream without becoming a part of it, that’s the trick.

Two makes a trend, right?

Monday, October 18th, 2010

Two tweets in a row from Pitchfork make almost the exact same comment about two different albums.

Andrew Gaerig on A Sunny Day in Glasgow’s latest, Autumn, Again: “more concise and less wily than its predecessor”

Tom Breihan on Bay Area garage-poppers the Fresh & Onlys’ latest, Play It Strange: “more focused, easier to digest”

It’s a movement!

A couple of final kicks

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

I’m about to take them off my RSS feed and my blog roll, but I did want to get one final kick in at the Maura-less Idolator. Two, actually. The first comes from Sasha Frere-Jones, who nailed the situation perfectly the other day when he said Maura had been replaced with “two iPhone apps that crash every hour.”

The other is in reaction to a post by the apps themselves. In a news piece on Nielsen Soundscan’s ranking of the best selling albums of the year and the decade, they make the usual comment about declining album sales, which they finish with “thanks in no small part to the advent of illegal downloading.” Now, I realize that as an all-pop-all-the-time site, they need to spend some time shilling for the major labels, but does that mean they have to be lap dogs for the RIAA, as well? Did they not notice how heavily most critical best of the decade lists are weighted toward the first few years of the oughts (Pitchfork’s top ten of the decade includes only one album made after 2004)? Albums stopped selling because more albums sucked, dimwits. I’ve long been amazed by the fact that the record industry, and therefore too many people who write about the record industry, refuses to make the connection between musical quality and sales. But that sort of thought is beyond the new management of Idolator—who are, after all, paid not to think.

So, goodbye Idolator. You’ve turned into that old house in the middle of the block that used to have really cool, creative people living in it, but is now full of crackheads. Let’s hope somebody bulldozes the place before the addiction spreads.